Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

The impeachment trial is underway and we've seen some good stuff so far. By good stuff, I don't mean anything damning against the President, I mean that it's just been entertaining.

There is so much contempt for one another that it was only expected to happen.

There came a point at the end of Day 1 of the trial that Chief Justice John Roberts who is presiding over the impeachment trial needed to make it clear that he wasn't going to tolerate the House managers and the President's legal counsel attitude and incivility they've exhibited, especially Jerry Nadler.

Here is what led to the Chief Justice to speak up:

Nadler said, “It’s embarrassing. The president is on trial in the Senate, but the Senate is on trial in the eyes of the American people. Will you vote to allow all the relevant evidence to be presented here? Or will you betray your pledge to be an impartial juror? … Will you bring Ambassador Bolton here? Will you permit us to present you with the entire record of the president’s misconduct? Or will you instead choose to be complicit in the president’s coverup? So far I’m sad to say I see a lot of senators voting for a coverup, voting to deny witnesses, an absolutely indefensible vote, obviously a treacherous vote.”

The White House Counsel fired right back with Par Cipollone saying, “We’ve made our arguments to you. And you don’t deserve, and we don’t deserve, what just happened. Mr. Nadler came up here and made false allegations against our team. He made false allegations against all of you; he accused you of a cover-up. He’s been making false allegations against the president. The only one who should be embarrassed, Mr. Nadler is you, for the way you’ve addressed the United States Senate. This is the United States Senate. You’re not in charge here. … It’s about time we bring this power trip in for a landing.”

Chief Justice Roberts addressed the room,

“It is appropriate at this point for me to admonish both the House managers and the president’s counsel in equal terms to remember that they are addressing the world’s greatest deliberative body,” Roberts sternly rebuked. “One reason it has earned that title is because its members avoid speaking in a manner, and using language, that is not conducive to civil discourse.”

“In the 1905 [Judge Charles] Swayne [impeachment] trial, a senator objected when one of the managers used the word ‘pettifogging’ — and the presiding officer said the word ought not to have been used,” the chief justice continued. “I don’t think we need to aspire to that high a standard, but I do think those addressing the Senate should remember where they are.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×