President Trump just scored another win with the Supreme Court. I've completely lost count at how many times the Supreme Court has sided with him.

Believe it or not, even Ruth Bader-Ginsburg took the President's side on a recent decision concerning his tax returns and she hates him more than anyone.

Once again, the highest court in the land determined that it is allowable for the Trump administration to begin enforcing new limits on immigrants who are more likely to be dependent on government assistance programs. This will help combat the immigration problem that we're having at the Southern Border, as will the wall.

According to NBC,

The court voted 5-4. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan said they would have left a lower court ruling in place that blocked enforcement while a legal challenge works its way through the courts.

The Department of Homeland Security announced in August that it would expand the definition of "public charge," to be applied to people whose immigration to the United States could be denied because of a concern that they would primarily depend on the government for their income.

In the past, that was largely based on an assessment that an immigrant would be dependent upon cash benefits. But the Trump administration proposed to broaden the definition to include noncash benefits, such as Medicaid, supplemental nutrition and federal housing assistance.

Anyone who would be likely to require that broader range of help for more than 12 months in any three-year period would be swept into the expanded definition.

Forbes reported that immigration analysts expect implementation of the public charge rule to be ruthless. An applicant would be denied permanent residence if a consular officer or immigration adjudicator, in effect, issues a prediction that an individual might use certain benefits for 12 months within a future 36-month period. U.S. District Judge George Daniels observed there is no precedent for this type of definition in the history of U.S. law.

The Migration Policy Institute concludes, “Nearly half of the U.S. noncitizen population could be at risk of a public-charge determination – up from the current 3%.” The technology startup Boundless estimates up to 200,000 young married couples could be at risk of not qualifying for a spousal green card under the regulation.

Trending Stories From Around the Web:

Schumer Gets Embarrassed When This Happened to 'Personal Guest' He Invited to Impeachment Trial

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer thought he would try to be slick and invite a controversial person as his guest to the impeachment trial.

However, that all backfired when his guest was removed from the public viewing area since he was wearing an electronic ankle bracelet. That guest was none other than Lev Parnas. Continue reading…

Elitist Local Governments Seek To BAN Dollar Stores Across the Country

Where I live, there are exactly three Dollar Generals within five minutes from my house. There are plenty more as I would continue to drive in any direction.

Unless you live out in the country, I would bet that you have some sort of dollar store near your house as well whether it be a Dollar General, Dollar Tree, or even a Family Dollar. Continue reading...

Pelosi Suggests Disbarment for Trump's Lawyers, Says They 'Disgraced' Themselves

On Thursday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi attacked President Trump's defense team, stating that his lawyers have "disgraced" themselves and the even suggested disbarment. Continue reading…

PETA Demands Punxsutawney Phil be Replaced with Robot for Groundhog Day

Groundhog Day as we know it stated on February 2, 1887, in Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania. It is a popular tradition in North America, in which the groundhog named Punxsutawny Phil emerges from his burrow and predicts the weather for the rest of winter. Continue reading...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×