Federal Judge Rules Against Hillary Clinton, Accuses Her of Collusion

Can Hillary Clinton slide out of trouble one more time? We’re about to find out.

A federal judge rules against Hillary Clinton and this one is trouble for her.

During a Thursday ruling Judge Royce Lamberth tore into Clintonwhen he granted Judicial Watch their Freedom of Information Act request against the State Department.

take our poll - story continues below

What is your top alternative to Facebook? - FIXED

  • What is your top alternative to Facebook?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Think Americana updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“At best, State’s efforts to pass off its deficient search as legally adequate during settlement negotiations was negligence born out of incompetence,” Lamberth said.

“At worst, career employees at the State and Justice departments colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA, and hoodwink this court,” the judge said in a brutal ruling, per The Hill.

In his ruling, Lamberth ordered the agencies to develop a plan with Judicial Watch for a discovery plan within 10 days that will determine whether Clinton used the server to evade FOIA requests. He also ruled that the plan should determine whether the State Department sought to settle the case with Judicial Watch “despite knowing the inadequacies of the initial search constituted bad faith.”

President Trump and Republicans have blasted Clinton’s use of a private server to send and receive emails pertaining to her government work. An FBI probe into her use of the server ended with no charges filed.

Judicial Watch alleges that Clinton used the server to avoid public scrutiny of her work.

Judge Lamberth also ordered more fact finding in the case of the email server, Politico reported.

Lamberth, who has clashed with Clinton and her aides in cases dating back to her husband’s administration, was unsparing in his assessment of the former secretary’s actions. He blasted Clinton’s email practices as “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.”

Lamberth also again expressed concerns that lawyers at the Justice Department and the State Department misled the court when they tried at the end of 2014 to wrap up Judicial Watch’s FOIA suit about Benghazi talking points even though some officials were aware months earlier that Clinton had tens of thousands of emails on a private system and had agreed to turn many of them over to State at its request.

“State played this card close to its chest,” the judge complained. “At best, State’s attempts to pass-off its deficient search as legally adequate during settlement negotiations was negligence born out of incompetence. At worst, career employees in the State and Justice Departments colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA and hoodwink this court.”

 

Previous Minnesota State University Professor Accuses God of Being Predatory - Mary 'Didn't Give Consent'
Next WATCH: President Trump Shows Off His Pride in the Military During Army-Navy Game Coin Toss

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.